
Given the nature of the SL (more of a grand touring type of car) and the extra chrome slathered on the vents, I highly doubt giant spoiler and rear airfoil are all that fuctional. And what's with the Mugan/Lumma Design random body panel paint job?

Given the nature of the SL (more of a grand touring type of car) and the extra chrome slathered on the vents, I highly doubt giant spoiler and rear airfoil are all that fuctional. And what's with the Mugan/Lumma Design random body panel paint job?
Hanamm - thy name is overkill. The X6 is lame enough in it's own right - a "4 door coupe SUV". It existance is pointless and defies logic (coupes don't have four doors, and what's the point of an SUV that lacks utility?). When it comes to SUVs, BMW has gotten to be one of the industries worst offenders. They now offer two SUVs that are nearly identical to two other SUVs (X1/X3, X5/X6). But I digress...

The car itself doesn't look that bad, but Mugan has started to get into this trend of leaving the modified pieces of it's cars unpainted. Which leaves them looking like the accident victims too poor to paint match the new pieces. I've noticed Brabus has started doing this too. It looks like crap people.


Save the mug, the Honda Pilot doesn't look that bad. But the huge headlights and massive plastic grille are a bit much. And they even had some bad feedback during the concept stage, yet did nothing.

Apparently it's "Rag on Ferrari Day". I suppose maybe this car was ahead of it's time being that it's from 1967 and it looks like bad kit car for a late 80's Renault Alpine. Still though - wouldn't you rather have an au-natural 330 GTC?

The Ferrari FX was a one off made by Ferrari for the Sultan of Brunei. Well - seven were made in total. Let's just say I'm grateful there's only seven. Made from a late model Testarossa (well - a 512M) in 1995. Although by 1995 the Testarossa looked quite dated, it still looks a lot better than this.