data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec47e/ec47e1bb269275bef27bd24e5c5d6810e92b3dda" alt=""
A blog devoted to RANTS ON AUTOMOTIVE DESIGN, car reviews, and - above all - fugly autos. whether looking for vehicular plagiarism or rides of extreme tastelessness, you've come to the right place.
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Mohs Ostentatienne Opera Sedan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f417/9f417599f7b558c78aaf669a70cb1d1f85a817c6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aa2f/4aa2fe050854ef602b2456f4f58f4f0edcaf9fa7" alt=""
The main difference visually from that of the SafariKar covered previously is that it's NOT covered in pleather. Overall the look is somehow better but worse - it's front end is marginally better due to the fact that the body isn't as tall, but the combo of the huge wheels and the equally tall, Pacer-like fishbowl of a greenhouse give the car a kind of toy car appearance.
Another noticeable change is it's complete lack of doors. The sole entry is through a hatch in the rear - kind of a reverse Isetta. So I guess you'd have to pray no one rear ends you. The reasoning behind this was actually safety - huge steel side rails ran the length of the car to protect the occupant in the event of a side-on collision. Which I suppose is a threat due to the fact that the styling may blind oncoming traffic.
Powered by an ever-so-refined International Harvester truck engine, the car offered fewer out-there interior features than the SafariKar, but you could order one with a refrigerator and Ming style oriental rugs. Prices ranged from $19,600 to $25,600 - in 1967.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)